A few posts ago (“Creating Something from Nothing” post), I discussed a set of requests from students (not part of the Business School) to learn how to build an organization, with a plan for capital, space, and personnel. Later I talked with a set of parents who wanted their students to learn basic conversational and written protocols of the non-academic sector organization. Dean Treanor of the Law Center has talked about how the lawyers are increasingly working in large organizations where financial planning, balance sheets, and profit and loss statements, forecasting, are part of their work. The Board of Regents think our graduates need skills useful in job interviews in the private sector, for example, reacting to common difficult questions that are asked of applicants to test their mettle. Many think our graduates would be better prepared for their lives with some additional polish.
If we do a good job, our undergraduates with a liberal education under their belts should possess the critical thinking skills that many employers are seeking for their long-term employees, but they would profit from some practical skills that make them valuable in an office on day one of their employment. Our Master’s and PhD students are increasingly entering businesses and large organizations that require practical work skills in addition to deep domain knowledge.
In a discussion with the school deans on the main campus, they too saw the need for such training. The more we discussed this, the more it seems that a set of mini-courses was one possibility, filled with practical information transmission, and features that exercised the learned material in a realistic setting. Some thought that alumni with strong presentational skills might be possible teachers and that professors of the practice now on campus would be good instructors. Some even thought that students themselves could be effective instructors for some material.
Many of the courses don’t fit inside our existing schools, although some of our schools are teaching much deeper, more theoretical courses in the same knowledge domain. So it seems that a new series of courses, maybe called University courses, might fit the bill. They would be bridge-building courses from the academy to the outside world. Some might carry one academic credit, with commensurate amount of work. Some might even carry no credit. They might be open to young alumni as well as current undergraduate and graduate students.
Topics for these courses that have been forwarded so far include:
- Financial literacy, reading balance sheets, profit/loss statements, alternative budget types
- The anatomy of a proposal with a business plan
- An introduction to entrepreneurship
- Job interviewing 101; alternative resume formats; networking and jobs
- Quantitative literacy, reading basic statistics, asking the right questions
- Business communication; the memo, the white paper, the presentation
- Discerning organizational cultures and how to navigate them
- Team building, working with teams
- Oral presentation practicum (the pitch, the autobiography, the debate, the speech, the report)
- Georgetown history / DC history
- Jesuit history and mission
- Data visualization
- Building a web site
- Business writing genres (memo, speech, report)
- Protocol (how to greet, introduce, discern relative status in hierarchies)
- Succeeding in an organization: discerning culture and power; creating internal and external coalitions
- Developing negotiating skills
What do you think?
I think the idea of “University Courses” is a great one. The Georgetown Entrepreneurship Initiative would be a willing sponsor of any entrepreneurship-related programs. Entrepreneurship is a topic that definitely crosses disciplines and can relate to just about any career plan (NOT just founding your own startup).
In fact, we have somewhat similar concept called the MVP Lean Learn series on the calendar this fall, teaching lean startup concepts and open to all Georgetown students. Info here: http://startuphoyas.com/mvp-lean-startup-series/
Happy to report back on how the series goes as we learn about these “non-course courses”.
Provost Groves,
This is an excellent idea for a University initiative! The GUAA Board of Governors (BOG) has been active in promoting alumni-student/young alumni interactions for the past several years. My BOG colleagues Jeff Chapski and John Reagan have posted above with ideas from other schools (Middlebury and MIT). Jeff also has made us aware of an article in the current Inside Higher Education on “XBA Programs” by Peter Olson, cofounder of The Fullbridge Program. http://www.insidehighered.com/views/2013/07/25/xba-programs-can-help-colleges-prepare-students-careers-essays#.UfKyh7pLzDY.facebook.
The GUAA Alumni Career Services (ACS) Program also has produced a CASE award-winning series of webinars, some of which could be directly applied to such an intiative. ACS also has compiled an impressive compendium of materials and resources for such a program. (http://alumni.georgetown.edu/career/career_1.html). The BOG also has sponsored the Hoya Gateway program, of which I know that you are aware. As one of many interested GU alumni, I believe that I can say that the GUAA stands ready to work with you going forward on such a bridgebuilding initiative.
Respectfully,
Michael E. Karam, F’72, L’76, L’81
Senator, GUAA Board of Governors.
Have such courses/seminars been considered in the idea of an MIT-styled intermester?
http://web.mit.edu/iap/about/index.html
check out Middlebury College’s MiddCORE program (http://middcore.middlebury.edu/). A great example of faculty-alumni partnership that helps students prepare for life after college.
We would like to pretend that 18 year olds are mature professional responsible adults, and we should treat them this way to encourage this growth. Nonetheless, we must teach things like job-interviewing 101 in order to develop the skills we would like to see: you get what you inspect –or in our case teach/create– not what you expect.
It might be helpful to talk about behaving like and adult and psychological health too. To really look at the whole person consistent with the “cura personalis” posters plastered all over campus, then we must also be willing to see what makes people mean or insecure, what worries them, etc. so that we might help them realize their full potential.
Don’t medical students have some training in bedside manner and professionalism? or do we just expect them magically to interact with patients well?
you certainly can teach empathetic listening and communicating skills if we believe there is any chance of ‘training’ psychologists/psychiatrists.
if relationships are what are most important in personal and professional lives, how does Georgetown help students learn to develop, maintain, and grow them? It’s not a traditional subject, yet central to our lives.